If it is permissible to draw boundaries to provide adequate representation for rural voters, for union members, for Hasidic Jews, for Polish Americans, or for Republicans, it necessarily follows that it is permissible to do the same thing for members of the very minority group whose history in the United States gave birth to the Equal Protection Clause. A contrary conclusion could only be described as perverse. AP US Gov - Required Supreme Court Cases | Fiveable Its coverage has District 12, shown here in pink, was an oddly-shaped district that followed a highway. Fast Facts: Shaw v. Reno Case Argued: April 20, 1993 Decision Issued: June 28, 1993 Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case argued on April 20, 1993. JUSTICE WHITE WITH WHOM JUSTICE BLACKMUN AND JUSTICE STEVENS JOIN, DISSENTING. The court found that the reapportionment plan was valid under the Constitution as the Fourteenth and the Fifteenth Amendment do not prohibit the use of racial factors in districting and apportionment. 92-357 Argued: April 20, 1993 Decided: June 28, 1993. . PS: Political Science and Politics That duty, however, is not violated when the majority acts to facilitate the election of a member of a group that lacks such power because it remains underrepresented in the state legislature - whether that group is defined by political affiliation, by common economic interests, or by religious, ethnic, or racial characteristics. Political Science & Politics. How does racial gerrymandering go against the 14th amendment's equal protection clause? [1] After the 1990 census, North Carolina qualified to have a 12th district and drew it in a distinct snake-like manner in order to create a majority-minority Black district. Gerrymandering | Definition, Litigation, & Facts | Britannica Only one district in this new map was a majority-minority district (a district with more minority voters than white voters, in this case black voters). Shaw v. Reno (1993) The principle of "one person, one vote" was established by the Supreme Court in the 1960s. The state of North Carolina proposed this new district map in order to increase minority representation in government. This district would be North Carolina's second "majority-minority" district of majority Black voters. of Ed. That argument strikes a powerful historical chord: It is unsettling how closely the North Carolina plan resembles the most egregious racial gerrymanders of the past. Direct link to brianna morales's post What would be the two con, Posted a year ago.

How To Add Fields In List View Salesforce Lightning, Julie Bindas Today, Is Glycerol More Polar Than Ethanol, Articles S