Reception of holy Communion on the tongue has been a tradition of the Church for more than 15 centuries. A.M.S. Featured Image: Rossano Gospels, Last Supper, 6th c.; Source: Wikimedia Commons, PD-Old-100. 3, Rep. Obj. EDITORS NOTE TO READER: If any of you fear that Fr. 5. Reception of holy Communion on the tongue has been a tradition of the Church for more than 15 centuries. Communion received on the tongue and while kneeling OF THE SUPREME PONTIFF Communion received on the tongue and while kneeling The most ancient practice of distributing Holy Communion was, with all probability, to give Communion to the faithful in the palm of the hand. T/F, 4. Timothy O'Malley on the meaning of Eucharistic coherence in the life of the Church. Let it be noted at the outset that St Leo the Great and St Gregory the Great are early witnesses to Communion on the Tongue as the normative. Test all things and hold fast to that which may be proven good (1Thessalonians 5: 21). We should forbid or at least discourage the Communion-on-the-tongue practice whereby the faithful are not allowed to take and eat, and should return to the pristine usage of the Fathers and Apostles, namely, Communion in the hand. T/F. In an even more elevated tone, Ephrem the Syrian, in a stunning passage, invites the Christian communicant to feel awe at what is placed in his or her hand, since even the Seraph did not take the divine coal with his hand, nor did the prophet Isaiah eat it (see: Isa 6:6). We are not claiming that under no circumstances whatever did the faithful receive by their own hands. Paul said, 1 Imitate me, just as I also imitate Christ (1Corinthians 11:1; NKJV). If Paul is imitating Christ, then we should imitate Paul; but, if Paul is not imitating Christ, then neither should we imitate Paul. For one who eats unworthily eats and drinks to his own condemnation (1 Cor 11:29). Why I Receive Communion on the Tongue | Marc Barnes Communion on the tongue is recommended and considered the most consonant way to receive the Eucharist, while Communion on the hand is permitted, provided that certain precautions are observed, such as checking to see if any fragments of the Host remain on the palm of the hand. Receiving the host in one's hand has been an option in the United States since the bishops authorized this in May 1977 and the Holy See confirmed it. Those who receive Communion may receive either in the hand or on the tongue, and the decision should be that of the individual receiving, not of the person distributing Communion. Plus, as was shown above, many popes, saints, and Councils have spoken about how and why distribution of Holy Communion should be left to the priest, and should only be done on the tongue. He is present, even in the most microscopic particle - even the ones people wipe on their pants. became more and more rare. A century and a half later Pope St. Gregory the Great (died in 604) is another witness. Most often when speaking of reverence, however, the Fathers emphasize two main things: 1) that every precaution should be taken lest the Eucharist fall to the ground and 2) that communicants should be from serious sin and quarrels with other Christians. Communion in the hand is legitimate only where permitted, and it remains in the realm of a permission. Phillip Schaff (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1889). At least every Christian man is a priest; I am not yet convinced that women qualify, although most of my brethren would contend that Christian women are as well. When we hold a baby or hug a loved one, we do so gently and with care. If we follow the example of the Fathers, we will prioritize practices that prevent the dropping of the Eucharist and catechizing communicants not to receive in a state of mortal sin. It does seem that from very early times on, it was usual for the priest to place the Sacred Host into the mouth of the communicant.

Rj Molinere Wife, How To Get Wrinklers In Cookie Clicker, Class Action Lawsuit That Have Sent Out Checks, Pebble Brook Apartments, Articles W